Coating and layering processes allow adding API and excipients onto carrier systems such as starter beads. Several goals can be satisfied, such as modified drug release, taste-masking, color, and more.

Posts

Abstract

Pellets are one of multiparticulate pharmaceutical forms and can offer numerous technical and biopharmaceutical advantages compared with single dose unit formulations, e.g. tablets and capsules. This study aimed at formulation of controlled-release pellets of doxazosin mesylate (DM), a widely used treatment for antihypertensive and benign prostatic hyperplasia. DM was loaded onto microcrystalline cellulose CELLETS® pellets using hydroalcoholic solution and alcoholic suspension layering techniques to achieve a minimum drug load of 4 mg DM/g pellets. DM-layered CELLETS were coated by Aquacoat dispersion (ready-made ethylcellulose dispersion) using a coating pan technique as a simple and widely utilized technique in pharmaceutical industry. Controlled-release DM-layered pellets showed a release profile comparable to the controlled-release commercial product Cardura® XL Tablet. Also, the mechanism of DM release from Aquacoat CELLETS® was mathematically modeled and imaged by scanning electron microscopy to elucidate drug release mechanisms from the prepared pellet formulations. Accelerated stability studies of the prepared pellets were performed under stress conditions of 40 °C, and 75 % RH for 3 months. In conclusion, preparation of controlled-release DM-layered CELLETS® is feasible using a simple and conventional coating pan technology. Read more about controlled-release doxazosin mesylate pellets.

References

H. A. Hazzah, M. A. EL-Massik, O. Y. Abdallah & H. Abdelkader, Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation (2013), 43:333–342. doi:10.1007/s40005-013-0077-0

Additional information

CELLETS® are perfect starter beads for coating and layering of API, such as doxazosin mesylate. Multilayer formulation attempts enable defined release profiles and improved bioavailability. Check different pellet sizes from 100 µm to 1400 µm which fit to your formulation.

Need formulation services?

Contact our partner Glatt Pharmaceutical Services!

Pore Former basic drugs

Abstract

Bioavailability of weakly basic drugs may be disrupted by dramatic pH changes or unexpected pH alterations in the gastrointestinal tract. Conventional organic acids or enteric coating polymers cannot address this problem adequately because they leach out or dissolve prematurely, especially during controlled release applications. Thus, a non-leachable, multifunctional terpolymer nanoparticle (TPN) made of cross-linked poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA)-polysorbate 80-grafted-starch (PMAA-PS 80-g-St) was proposed to provide pH transition-independent release of a weakly basic drug, verapamil HCl (VER), by a rationally designed bilayer-coated controlled release bead formulation. The pH-responsive PMAA and cross-linker content in the TPN was first optimized to achieve the largest possible increase in medium uptake alongside the smallest decrease in drug release rate at pH 6.8, relative to pH 1.2. Such TPNs maintained an acidic microenvironmental pH (pHm) when loaded in ethylcellulose (EC) films, as measured using pH-indicating dyes. Further studies of formulations revealed that with the 1:2 VER:TPN ratio and 19% coating weight gain, bilayer-coated beads maintained a constant release rate over the pH transition and exhibited extended release up to 18 h. These results demonstrated that the multifunctional TPN as a pHm modifier and pH-dependent pore former could overcome the severe pH-dependent solubility of weakly basic drugs.

Introduction

Many existing active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) (drug compounds) are either weak acids or weak bases; their water solubility can change significantly with the lumen pH changes along the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) as a result of variation in the ionization degree. Severe pH-dependent solubility could pose a great challenge to achieving consistent and predictable performance of oral dosage forms, as abrupt changes in release rate may result in unexpected dissolution, absorption, and bioavailability of the drug, leading to increased risks of adverse side effects or decreased therapeutic efficacy. This problem may be pronounced for weakly basic drugs with low solubility at high pH, especially those with a narrow therapeutic index, or requiring prolonged release, because in the lower GIT the pH is >6.8 [1]. Furthermore, food intake, disease state (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, gastritis, colitis), concomitant medication (e.g., proton pump inhibitors), and inter- and intra-individual variations, among other factors, can alter the pH in the GIT, which deviates from the pH of simulated gastric and intestinal fluid for in vitro testing and prediction [2,3,4]. Hence, novel strategies to formulate weakly basic drugs with extreme pH-dependent solubility in controlled release forms could enhance the repertoire of advanced medications available to patients.
To compensate for the varying pH values in the GIT, several approaches have been employed. One approach is the addition of small-molecule pH modifiers to the immediate vicinity of the drug to change the microenvironmental pH (pHm), thus enhancing the drug solubility. For example, organic acids (e.g., adipic, fumaric, and succinic acids) have been introduced into formulations of weakly basic drugs, reducing the pHm sufficiently, thereby facilitating drug dissolution, irrespective of the pH of the bulk solvent [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Drug release will depend on the compatibility of the organic acid with the drug in terms of the buffering capacity of organic acids and the pKa of the drug. Nevertheless, the incorporation of organic acids remains challenging as they are prone to leach out from the formulation, leading to inefficient pH modulation over time [12]. Therefore, large amounts of organic acids are required in order to achieve prolonged pH-independent drug release [5,13], which often makes this approach inadequate for controlled release formulations.
Another approach to compensate for the reduction in drug solubility is the use of enteric coating polymers on tablets, pellets, or beads as permeability modifiers, which can increase drug permeability at higher pH. In such coatings, polymers with pH-dependent solubility or swellability are employed, either alone or incorporated in a hydrophobic polymer (e.g., ethylcellulose (EC)) that acts as a membrane barrier to drug diffusion, resulting in slowed drug release. For example, methacrylic acid–ethyl acrylate copolymer (Eudragit® L) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate are frequently incorporated into these membranes as pore forming materials for pH-dependent release [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. At a pH above their pKa’s, the pore formers dissolve and leach out of the membrane film to form channels that facilitate drug diffusion. However, as pore formers leach out, the film becomes more porous and weaker, increasing the risk of dose dumping due to weakened structure or ruptures of the coating [24].
Recent advances using biopolymer-based nanomaterials, molecular imprinted polymers, and mathematical and computational models have been used to address the various challenges of drug delivery systems [25,26,27,28,29]. Biopolymers such as starch, collagen, chitosan, etc., are useful for their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and ease of synthesis and modifications [25]. Controlled release dosage forms capable of being flexible, releasing drugs in a timely manner, with desired duration and dosage, are more important than ever, and mathematical and computational models also function as influential tools in addressing the potential mechanisms or impediments of drug delivery systems [26,27,28,29].
Previously, a crosslinked terpolymer nanoparticle (TPN), consisting of poly(methacrylic acid)-polysorbate 80-grafted-starch (PMAA-PS 80-g-St) [30,31,32,33], was incorporated into ethylcellulose films (TPN-EC) to respectively reduce or enhance the permeability of the film coating by a pH-dependent shrinking (at low pH) and swelling (at high pH) mechanism [34]. Unlike other soluble polymeric pore-formers, the TPN did not increase the viscosity of EC dispersions for coating, attributable to its crosslinking structure [31,32,33]. For the same reason, TPN did not leach out from cast TPN-EC films, maintaining good mechanical properties compared to conventional Eudragit® L-EC films. When used as a membrane coating over beads loaded with a water-soluble drug, diltiazem HCl, TPN-EC provided faster drug release at pH 6.8 than at pH 1.2 [34]. The biocompatibility of TPN was demonstrated previously in vitro using isolated rat hepatocytes [32].
Inspired by previous findings regarding the pH-dependent properties of TPN, in this work, we explore the application of TPN for the first time to develop an advanced, controlled release bilayer-coated bead formulation for weakly basic drugs that exhibits severe pH-dependent water solubility. Verapamil HCl (VER) was selected as a model drug because it undergoes extreme decrease in solubility by several orders of magnitude when the media pH is increased from acidic to neutral and weakly basic conditions [9,35]. By exploiting the pH-dependence of TPN, we proposed that an increase in permeability at high pH could help compensate for the low solubility of the drug in its unionized form, thereby permitting a constant release rate when transitioning from gastric to intestinal pH. Additionally, we explored the ability of TPN to serve as a pHm modifier, owing to the presence of its acidic functional groups in MAA. Because TPN is retained within EC, unlike traditional leachable pHm modifiers when formulated together with the drug in a matrix, the source of the acidifying agent could be sustained throughout dissolution, while preserving dosage form integrity.
To investigate the effectiveness of combining both the permeability and the pHm modulation strategies of TPN, experiments were performed using EC matrix free-films incorporated with VER and TPN (VER-TPN-EC) and a bilayer-coated bead design consisting of an inner VER-TPN-EC matrix, surrounded by an outer membrane composed of TPN-EC. As illustrated in Figure 1, the TPN composition was first adjusted by varying the amounts of the pH-responsive monomer, MAA, and cross-linker, N,N′-methylenebis(acrylamide) (MBA) for pH-dependent swelling (medium uptake) and drug release via experiments using composite free-films. The best-performing TPN-containing films were then tested for their ability to lower pHm. Subsequently, the TPN was incorporated into a bilayer-coated bead design, where it was expected to lower the pHm in the matrix layer and regulate permeability in the membrane layer by its pH-dependent swelling. The effects of formulation parameters such as VER:TPN ratio within the matrix layer and membrane coating level on the pH-independence of dissolution rate in various pH conditions were evaluated.
Figure 1. A flow chart of the optimization strategy to achieve pH transition-independent controlled release of VER from a TPN-containing bilayer-coated beads. Formulation strategy for TPN bilayer-coated beads containing weakly basic VER Optimization of TPN composition to achieve pHm modification and pH-dependent swelling, followed by strategic placement of TPN in the bilayer bead matrix and membrane layers are proposed to overcome pH-dependent solubility of VER. Figure created with BioRender.com (accessed on 15 December 2022).
Our cumulative research investigating the various applications of TPN (e.g., nanoparticle drug carrier in injectables, enteric coating agent and pore former in film coatings, recrystallization inhibitor in amorphous solid dispersions) is helping us widen the breadth of its capabilities. Namely, in the present research, the ability of TPN for pHm modification, pH-responsive swelling, nanoscale pore formation, interaction with drugs, and non-leachability comprise a set of multi-faceted features that set it apart from traditional excipients, which could improve the efficacy and quality of controlled release dosage forms for weakly basic drugs. As the landscape of new drug molecules continues to shift towards greater challenges (e.g., poor solubility, pH-dependent solubility, narrow therapeutic index, etc.) the need for more advanced, multifunctional excipients can be expected to increase.

Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Soluble corn starch, methacrylic acid (MAA), N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA), sodium thiosulfate (STS), potassium persulfate (KPS), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and sodium phosphate tribasic were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Verapamil HCl (VER) was purchased from Spectrum Chemicals, (New Brunswick, NJ, USA). Hydrochloric acid (HCl) was purchased from Caledon (Georgetown, ON, Canada). SNARF-4F (#S23920) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, ON, Canada). Bromocresol green was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Ethylcellulose (Surelease® E-7-19040) was kindly donated by Colorcon (West Point, PA, USA). Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Kollidon®/PVPK30) was kindly donated by BASF (Ludwigshaven, Germany). Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80-LQ-(CQ)) was kindly donated by Croda (Edison, NJ, USA). Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) beads ([…] annotation from the publisher: for example: CELLETS® 700) were used as the coating substrate […].

Conclusions

In this work, the multifunctionality of a nanogel TPN was investigated as a non-leachable pHm modifier and pH-responsive pore former in a bilayer-coated bead formulation for the pH transition-independent controlled release of weakly basic drugs. The results demonstrated that incorporation of TPN, comprised of pH-sensitive MAA and cross-linker MBA, enables the inner matrix layer of VER-TPN-EC to maintain a pHm approximately 1.5 unit lower than the external buffer pH, which may be further enhanced by coating with a TPN-EC membrane. In a simulated gastric and intestinal pH transition condition (i.e., from pH 1.2 to 6.8), the bilayer-coated beads with 16% to 19% WG resulted in a constant release rate during the pH transition, followed by a sustained release of VER up to 18 h, beyond the extent achieved when tested in single pH media. This ability to overcome the poor solubility of VER at high pH can be ascribed to the combinatory effects of the pH-dependent swelling of TPN that increased permeability, preferred retention of protons in the TPN due to Donnan equilibrium, pH-dependent complexation between MAA and VER, and the barrier to diffusion of buffer ions by the outer coating. This work suggests that the multifunctionality and tunability of TPN-EC formulations and the formulation design strategy may be expanded to tackle the challenges faced by other drugs with severe pH-dependence of water solubility.

Disclaimer

Excerpt from: Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(2), 547; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020547. by Hao Han R. Chang, Kuan Chen, Jamie Anne Lugtu-Pe, Nour AL-Mousawi, Xuning Zhang, Daniel Bar-Shalom, Anil Kane, and Xiao Yu Wu.

References

  1. Dvořáčková, K.; Doležel, P.; Mašková, E.; Muselík, J.; Kejdušová, M.; Vetchý, D. The effect of acid pH modifiers on the release characteristics of weakly basic drug from hydrophlilic-lipophilic matrices. AAPS Pharmscitech 201314, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bassi, P.; Kaur, G. pH modulation: A mechanism to obtain pH-independent drug release. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 20107, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, Y.; Koyama, Y.; Shimada, S. Measurement of intraluminal pH changes in the gastrointestinal tract of mice with gastrointestinal diseases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022620, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vinarov, Z.; Abdallah, M.; Agundez, J.A.G.; Allegaert, K.; Basit, A.W.; Braeckmans, M.; Ceulemans, J.; Corsetti, M.; Griffin, B.T.; Grimm, M.; et al. Impact of gastrointestinal tract variability on oral drug absorption and pharmacokinetics: An UNGAP review. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021162, 105812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thoma, K.; Ziegler, I. The pH-independent release of fenoldopam from pellets with insoluble film coats. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 199846, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bolourchian, N.; Dadashzadeh, S. PH-independent release of propranolol hydrochloride from HPMC-based matrices using organic acids. Daru 200816, 136–142. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nie, S.; Pan, W.; Li, X.; Wu, X. The effect of citric acid added to hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) matrix tablets on the release profile of vinpocetine. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 200430, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Espinoza, R.; Hong, E.; Villafuerte, L. Influence of admixed citric acid on the release profile of pelanserin hydrochloride from HPMC matrix tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 2000201, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Streubel, A.; Siepmann, J.; Dashevsky, A.; Bodmeier, R. pH-independent release of a weakly basic drug from water-insoluble and -soluble matrix tablets. J. Control. Release 200067, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Obaidat, A. Modulation of the micro-environmental pH and its influence on the gel layer behavior and release of theophylline from hydrophilic matrices. Int. J. Pharma. Bio Sci. 20134, P794–P802. [Google Scholar]
  11. Siepe, S.; Lueckel, B.; Kramer, A.; Ries, A.; Gurny, R. Assessment of tailor-made HPMC-based matrix minitablets comprising a weakly basic drug compound. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 200834, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Siepe, S.; Lueckel, B.; Kramer, A.; Ries, A.; Gurny, R. Strategies for the design of hydrophilic matrix tablets with controlled microenvironmental pH. Int. J. Pharm. 2006316, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Akiyama, Y.; Yoshioka, M.; Horibe, H.; Hirai, S.; Kitamori, N.; Toguchi, H. pH-independent controlled-release microspheres using polyglycerol esters of fatty acids. J. Pharm. Sci. 199483, 1600–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lecomte, F.; Siepmann, J.; Walther, M.; MacRae, R.J.; Bodmeier, R. Blends of enteric and GIT-insoluble polymers used for film coating: Physicochemical characterization and drug release patterns. J. Control. Release 200389, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sakellariou, P.; Rowe, R.C.; White, E.F.T. Polymer/polymer interaction in blends of ethyl cellulose with both cellulose derivatives and polyethylene glycol 6000. Int. J. Pharm. 198634, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sakellariou, P.; Rowe, R.C. Phase separation and morphology in ethylcellulose/cellulose acetate phthalate blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 199143, 845–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lecomte, F.; Siepmann, J.; Walther, M.; MacRae, R.J.; Bodmeier, R. pH-Sensitive polymer blends used as coating materials to control drug release from spherical beads: Elucidation of the underlying mass transport mechanisms. Pharm. Res. 200522, 1129–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khan, M.Z.; Prebeg, Z.; Kurjaković, N. A pH-dependent colon targeted oral drug delivery system using methacrylic acid copolymers. I. Manipulation Of drug release using Eudragit L100-55 and Eudragit S100 combinations. J. Control. Release 199958, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. John, R.; Howard, P.T. Controlled Release Formulation. U.S. Patent US4792452A, 20 December 1988. [Google Scholar]
  20. Amighi, K.; Timmermans, J.; Puigdevall, J.; Baltes, E.; Moës, A.J. Peroral sustained-release film-coated pellets as a means to overcome physicochemical and biological drug-related problems. I. In vitro development and evaluation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 199824, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gruber, P.; Brickl, R.; Bozler, G.; Stricker, H. Dipyricamole Sustained Release Forms Comprising Lacquer-Coated Particles and the Preparation Thereof. U.S. Patent US4367217A, 4 January 1983. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cole, E.T.; Scott, R.A.; Connor, A.L.; Wilding, I.R.; Petereit, H.U.; Schminke, C.; Beckert, T.; Cadé, D. Enteric coated HPMC capsules designed to achieve intestinal targeting. Int. J. Pharm. 2002231, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Felton, L.A.; Porter, S.C. An update on pharmaceutical film coating for drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug. Deliv. 201310, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Frohoff-Hülsmann, M.A.; Lippold, B.C.; McGinity, J.W. Aqueous ethyl cellulose dispersion containing plasticizers of different water solubility and hydroxypropyl methyl-cellulose as coating material for diffusion pellets II: Properties of sprayed films. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 199948, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jacob, J.; Haponiuk, J.T.; Thomas, S.; Gopi, S. Biopolymer based nanomaterials in drug delivery systems: A review. Mater. Today Chem. 20189, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luliński, P. Molecularly imprinted polymers based drug delivery devices: A way to application in modern pharmacotherapy. A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 201776, 1344–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shamsi, M.; Mohammadi, A.; Manshadi, M.K.D.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Mathematical and computational modeling of nano-engineered drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2019307, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al Ragib, A.; Chakma, R.; Dewan, K.; Islam, T.; Kormoker, T.; Idris, A.M. Current advanced drug delivery systems: Challenges and potentialities. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 202276, 103727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Davoodi, P.; Lee, L.Y.; Xu, Q.; Sunil, V.; Sun, Y.; Soh, S.; Wang, C.-H. Drug delivery systems for programmed and on-demand release. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018132, 104–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, Z.; Cheung, R.; Wu, X.Y.; Ballinger, J.R.; Bendayan, R.; Rauth, A.M. A study of doxorubicin loading onto and release from sulfopropyl dextran ion-exchange microspheres. J. Control. Release 200177, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wong, H.L.; Bendayan, R.; Rauth, A.M.; Wu, X.Y. Development of solid lipid nanoparticles containing ionically complexed chemotherapeutic drugs and chemosensitizers. J. Pharm. Sci. 200493, 1993–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shalviri, A.; Raval, G.; Prasad, P.; Chan, C.; Liu, Q.; Heerklotz, H.; Rauth, A.M.; Wu, X.Y. pH-Dependent doxorubicin release from terpolymer of starch, polymethacrylic acid and polysorbate 80 nanoparticles for overcoming multi-drug resistance in human breast cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 201282, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shalviri, A.; Chan, H.K.; Raval, G.; Abdekhodaie, M.J.; Liu, Q.; Heerklotz, H.; Wu, X.Y. Design of pH-responsive nanoparticles of terpolymer of poly(methacrylic acid), polysorbate 80 and starch for delivery of doxorubicin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013101, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, K.; Chang, H.H.R.; Shalviri, A.; Li, J.; Lugtu-Pe, J.A.; Kane, A.; Wu, X.Y. Investigation of a new pH-responsive nanoparticulate pore former for controlled release enteric coating with improved processability and stability. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017120, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yoshida, M.I.; Gomes, E.C.L.; Soares, C.D.V.; Cunha, A.F.; Oliveira, M.A. Thermal Analysis Applied to Verapamil Hydrochloride Characterization in Pharmaceutical Formulations. Molecules 201015, 2439–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Coating uniformity of hot-melt coated particles Figure 2 (pure)

Abstract

Coating uniformity is a critical parameter in coating processes in novel pharmaceutical formulations. Speaking about pellet technology, coating and layering are the main methods for implementing drug functionalities, such as modified release of the active, taste-masking properties and further more. Coating uniformity guaranties not only upholding functionalities of the formulation, but also prevent risks such as dose dumping.

This application note is based on a publication of Wörthmann et al. [1] and focuses on selected aspects which are related to starter cores.

Cellets 1000, magnification 100x

Figure 1: Microscopic image of Cellets® 1000, magnification 100x.

Materials and techniques

Coating was applied on highly spherical starter cores Cellets® 1000 (Figure 1). The pellets have a relatively narrow size distribution with a mean particle size of d­­­­50 = 1197 μm, a standard deviation of σ = 113 μm, and particle density of 1.4 g/cm3. For analyzing the coating uniformity, stearin (54 % stearic acid and palmitic acid) and hydrogenated palm oil were used. For the hot-melt coating experiments a lab-scale Wurster fluidized bed was used. The overspray rate was estimated to 8 % (w/w). Processed particles were analyzed by image analysis (Figure 2) and micro-computed-tomography (μCT) (Figure 3). 2D and 3D software analysis were further conducted for the evaluation of the sphere dimension, layer thickness and coating uniformity.

Figure 2 shows a wax-coated particle, where the coating thickness varies and delamination is clearly visible (Figure 3). Small pores and fractions of the coating layer area are obvious.

Coating uniformity of hot-melt coated particles Figure 1

Figure 2: Images of coated pellets are used for a stepwise evaluation of the particle shell thickness. A: original image; B: segmented coating layer. Further software calculation steps are not shown here.

These undesired artefacts result from imperfect parameters, such as spreading mechanism, temperature fluctuations, viscosity, or drop size.

The coating layer thickness is analyzed for three particles of the same batch (Figure 4) using 5 % (w/w) stearin at a spraying rate of 1 g/min. The layer thickness varies between approximately 2 µm to 30 µm. A mean coating thickness is found between 12 µm and 16 µm.

Coating uniformity of hot-melt coated particles Figure 2

Figure 3: Portion of a micro-computed-tomography image of a wax-coated particle showing.

Coating uniformity of hot-melt coated particles Figure 3

Figure 4: Relative frequency of the coating layer-thickness of three particle shells from the same batch using 5 % (w/w) stearin at a spraying rate of 1 g/min. Mean thicknesses: particle I (blue): 15.5 μm, particle II (red): 12.4 μm, and particle III (grey): 15.6 μm.

In terms of customer safety and of compliance aspects, not only statistical information about the layer thickness are of interest. In case of inhomogeneous layers, taste-masking functionalities or even uncontrolled dose dumping might occur. In this context, a single-particle analysis is mandatory. 3D µCT is a powerful tool, which is complementary to existing methods, such as laser imaging methods, 2D analysis or thickness estimations. The analyzed mean thickness deviates by approximately 13 % among these methods (Figure 5).

Coating uniformity of hot-melt coated particles Figure 4

Figure 5: Mean layer-thicknesses measured using different methods. Relative standard deviation: 13 %.

Summary

Microcrystalline cellulose pellets (Cellets®) are used to study coating uniformity. 3D μCT can be a powerful tool to assess the quality of the final product coating and facilitates the selection of an appropriate combination of core particles and coating material. 3D visualization methods allow a critical single-particle analysis with a resolution of up to 2 µm. Furthermore, the determination of the particle’s uncoated surface area can be specified.

Acknowledgement

Prof. Heiko Briesen, Mario Wörthmann (Technical University Munich) and team are gratefully acknowledged for serving content for this note.

Research was financially supported by the Ministry of Economics and Energy (BMWi) and FEI (Germany) via project AiF 19970 N. Equipment funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Germany) 198187031.

References

[1] B.M. Woerthmann, J.A. Lindner, T. Kovacevic, P. Pergam, F. Schmid, H. Briesen, Powder Technology 378 (2021) 51–59

Abstract

Cellets are inert starter cores made of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). They play an important role in new formulations of solid dosage forms. As a carrier system for actives, the chemical inertness and surface smoothness are crucial parameters. Additionally, high level of robustness and sphericity simplify formulations and technical processes, such as fluidized bed technologies for coating and layering. In a joint study between the University of Hertfordshire and Freeman Technology (a Micromeritics company), the effect of pellets’ size on the behavior in a Wurster process is explained. Wurster fluid bed coating of Cellets with particle size larger than 400 µm is unproblematic. However, decreasing the particle size begins to complicate the coating process. So, powder rheology was used to compare Cellets with different particle sizes in terms of their effect on the powder flow in the Wurster fluid bed coater. For deeper knowledge, we strongly recommend reading investigations by V. Mohylyuk et al. [1]

Materials

Cellets® 90, 100, 200 and 350 (D50-size from 94 µm to 424 μm, Ingredientpharm, Switzerland). MCC powder Avicel® PH-102 (supplied by IMCD UK Ltd., UK) is included in the investigations, as it is widely used in industry and can be used by readers for comparison with other studies.

Wurster fluid-bed

Wurster process is a bottom-spray method, employed as a coating technology, for layering powder-like particles in a fluidized bed system (Figure 1). The process can be separated in different zones of mass flow, such as the down-flow zone or the horizontal transport zone. The flowability in these zones is crucial for homogeneous and efficient coating of the particles.

wurster_500x500

Figure 1: Wurster process is a bottom-spray method for layering powder-like particles in a fluidized bed system.

Hereby, the size of particles might play an important role. The narrow size distribution of MCC pellets is shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Measured data is presented in Table 1.

Figure-2

Volume weightened size distribution of Cellets 90 (red, diamonds), Cellets 100 (orange, triangles), Cellets 200 (blue, circles), Cellets 350 (green, squares).

The compact Cellets with fair sphericity, zero friability and a high level of surface smoothness show a fair mass flow rate which is almost independent of particle size at given experimental conditions and was determined by the gravitational funnel method. The reference MCC powder did not flow through the orifice.

Excipient PSD
[µm]
Span
[µm]
Flow rate
[g/s]
Avicel PH-102 115a 1.85 No flow
Cellets 90 94b 0.44 1.76
Cellets 100 163b 0.27 2.06
Cellets 200 270b 0.34 1.89
Cellets 350 424b 0.22 1.83

Table 1: Particle size distribution (D50) value and span by laser diffraction (a) and digital microscopy (b), and the mass flow rate by gravitational funnel method (5 mm diameter orifice) for the investigated excipients.

Impact of the Cellets’ size

The impact of the Cellets’ size on bulk powder behavior can only be estimated by screening additional parameters. In addition to the mass flow rate, standard pharmacopoeia methods such as bulk/tapped density were initially employed for the characterization of the powder’s properties. This was extended to rotating drum measurements providing the dynamic angle of repose and dynamic cohesivity index. Via powder rheology the conditioned bulk density, basic flowability energy, specific energy, pressure drop, permeability and compressibility (Figure 4) were obtained [1].

By picking the compressibility of Cellets at an applied force of 10 kPa normal stress, two key points need to be mentioned: (a) smaller particle size induces a higher rate of compressibility; (b) Cellets are less compressible than the reference MCC powder.

These findings are part of the open question on powder flow in a Wurster process. It is expected, that Cellets with a lower compressibility will result in better flow behavior in the fluidized bed.

Figure-3

Microscopic imaging of Cellets 100 (top left), 200 (top right), 350 (bottom left) with 1 mm scale bar and 100x magnification. Bottom right: surface of Cellets 350 in 1000x magnification.

Figure-4

Compressibility at 10 kPa normal stress on Cellets with varying particle size (D50) and Avicel® PH-102.

Summary

The flow of Cellets’ through a Wurster fluid-bed coater is likely to show improved performance as the Cellets’ particle size increases. Among others, a lower compressibility demonstrates a rheological behavior which is superior to MCC.

References

[1] Mohylyuk V, Styliari ID, Novykov D, Pikett R, Dattani R. Assessment of the effect of Cellets’ particle size on the flow in a Wurster fluid-bed coater via powder rheology. J D Deliv Sci Tec. 2019; 54: 101320, doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101320.

CS_taste_image_1

Abstract

Several drug substances are known to be extremely bitter. In special for paediatric and geriatric applications, costumer compliance by means of taste acceptance is a highly sensitive topic. Taste masking is therefore an important issue in pharmaceutical industry of oral dosage forms not only to improve the compliance, but it is also used to define a unique taste identification by the costumer (competition advantages). This case study will focus on taste-masking of an API and on the optimization of release in the absorption window of the API.

Modifying the taste

Several methods are available to actively influence, hide or modify taste, such as the initial activation of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) by biotransformation [1], the complexation into the cavity of a complexing agent [2] or layering with coating substances [3] and other methods.

Among all these solutions, coating seems to be one of the best understood and most flexible methods. In terms of the API bitterness, mild and extreme bitter APIs are applicable. Additionally, coating [4] is well suited for high dosed API formulations. There are two main approaches: (1) direct coating of the bitter API particles in multiple unit pellet system (MUPS) tablets, or (2) global coating of the tablet which contains the bitter API.

In this case study, we focus on the direct coating of API in a formulation based on starter cores as the unit pellet system. CELLETS® 200 are used as starter cores. They are pellets made of microcrystalline cellulose in size ranges from 100 µm to 1400 µm. In this specific case study, the core size ranges between 100 µm and 200 µm with a defined size distribution. The main advantages of CELLETS® are high sphericity, low friability and optimum in hardness. An API is coated onto the starter cores with a drug load of 5-20 %. The taste-masking coating is performed with Eudragit EPO® so that the resulting particle size remains below 500 µm (Figure 1). Eudragit is the polymer of choice as it ideally prevents API release in oral cavity and allows its release in the absorption window of the API. The final dosage form is a MUPS tablet (Figure 2).

CS_taste_image_1

Sketch of a coated pellet starter core (green) with API (blue) and taste masking Eudragit EPO® (yellow) coating. The API drug load is between 5 % to 20 %. The resulting particle size remains below 500 µm.

Compaction is an issue during production, which requires mechanically stable pellets. Coated CELLETS® 200 after compaction still represent as “hard” core pellets. The coated pellets show only little deformation, a reversible compaction behavior and an intact coating.

CS_taste_image_2

Sketch of a MUPS tablet. Coated starter cores (yellow) and filling excipient formulation (white).

Here, the MUPS formulation defines a content uniformity with an excellent taste masking at pH 7 (as a measure for the oral cavity) and fast dissolution at pH 1 (representing conditions in the stomach). Figure 3 shows the evaluation of taste masking and dissolution efficiency tests, where the dissolution at pH 7 remains less than 10 % after 10 minutes, and a desired dissolution at pH 1 with a drug release better than 85 % after 30 minutes.

CS_taste_image_3

Drug release versus time for coated CELLETS® 200 starter cores. Blue line: in vitro dissolution testing at pH 1 (stomach). Red line: taste masking evaluation at pH 7 (oral cavity).

Summary

Taste masking and modification is crucial for costumer compliance in paediatric and geriatric applications. Several methods are available, such as direct API coating. CELLETS® are perfect starter cores for a successful formulation and simplify taste masking of extreme bitter APIs. CELLETS® properties allow perfect coating abilities due to a high degree of sphericity. CELLETS® of small sizes and narrow size distribution are applicable in MUPS tablets thanks to their low friability and excellent hardness.

References

[1] K. Rafik. Computationally Designed Prodrugs for Masking the Bitter Taste of Drugs. Drug Des. Open Access (2012).

[2] V. Vummaneni and D. Nagpal. Recent, taste masking technologies: an overview and updates. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. (2012) 3, 510-524.

[3] D. Sharma, D. Kumar, M. Singh, G. Singh and M. Rathore. Taste masking technologies: a novel approach for the improvement of the organoleptic property of pharmaceutical active substance. Int. Res. J. Pharm. (2012) 3, 108-116.

[4] Hazzah, H.A., EL-Massik, M.A., Abdallah, O.Y. et al. Preparation and characterization of controlled-release doxazosin mesylate pellets using a simple drug layering-aquacoating technique. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation 43 (2013) 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-013-0077-0